All of us share a universal need: to secure a healthy and happy life for ourselves and those closest to us. We’re here to help. We find effective and convenient solutions to everyday symptoms that make a difference to people all over the world. We are RB, the global force in health, hygiene and home. People all over the world use our brands. They're on store shelves in nearly 200 countries and millions of people trust them every day to make their daily routines easier. Brands that touch people's lives Ideas brought to life Innovation comes from the science of living; we’re grounded in science and led by consumer need. We develop great ideas that help people lead healthier lives today and tomorrow. PARTNERS WITH GREAT IDEAS We’re inspired by like-minded innovators. Partnership is in our DNA and we can help get your idea into people's hands on a global scale. Take charge of your own career. Ownership and autonomy inspires exceptional people, we’re looking for those fearless entrepreneurs who can make a difference.

Careers that are limitless Our purpose-driven strategy is delivering consistent and sustainable growth as we continue to consolidate our focus in health, hygiene and home. A plan for betteusiness The world faces complex challenges, just talking about responsibility is not enough. Growth and responsibility go hand in hand, so we’re taking action. We’re working towards our 2020 goals to make sure we’re making the right kind of impact. RB global CEO apologises to the victims and families affected by Oxy HS product in Korea CEO of RB plc, met with Oxy Humidifier Sanitizer (HS) victims and families and with representatives of the Korean National Assembly Special Committee (SC) today at the Company’s headquarters in Slough, UK, to offer his deepest apology. RB remains part of the Dow Jones Sustainability Index 2016 S&P Dow Jones Indices confirmed today that RB remains part of the Dow Jones Sustainability Index following the 2016 review RB and Lions Health address air pollution with innovations to save children's lives

Slough, UK, June 21 2016 - An air purifying baby pacifier, lung strengthening musical toy and pollution-trapping paint have been proposed as pioneering solutions that could protect children from the effects of air pollution – the world’s largest environmental health risk. The new $50 million remake of the television mini-series Roots can readily be avoided by viewers, but it’s not so easy to dismiss this latest instance of political and social coercion based on race manipulation. The 1977 Roots mini-series (produced by documentary specialist David L. Wolper) was a genuine cultural event (surpassing Robert Altman’s 1975 Nashville as the era’s great American movie epic), which made the shadowy history of American slavery an urgent social topic. Roots attracted unprecedented numbers of viewers and kick-started the genealogical movement of investigative memoirs, family-history websites, and TV shows that played no small part in re-popularizing the political slogan “We are a nation of immigrants.”

That sentimental slogan might be inherently divisive (because of its implicit overlooking of America’s native peoples), but the slogan also demonstrates the way Roots’ shocking disclosures about the cruelties of America’s past were subject to revision. wertheim vacuum cleaner model 5035The discomforting history of man’s inhumanity to man, a possible model for understanding contemporary rancor and competition, is now turned to the advantage of modern political and cultural powerbrokers.colic sweep vacuum cleaner white noise download This new Roots is more aggressively, repulsively violent than the original, and it is also, comparatively, shallow. miele vacuum cleaner bags s5260

Yet it is crucial to understand that this shallowness isn’t so much an “art” issue. (The well-photographed black faces in the African scenes show the aesthetic impact of The Color Purple, Beloved, and Do the Right Thing.) These showrunners are highly aware of their socially conscious intent, but the show’s inconsequence reflects a timely political problem. This Roots reboot joins the current vogue of race-themed films such as Precious, The Help, Django Unchained, 12 Years a Slave, The Butler, Selma, and Straight Outta Compton (with more on the way) — a revanchist movement that mogul Harvey Weinstein attributed to “the Obama Effect.” Roots’ personal saga is significantly different from President Obama’s own heritage narrative. Roots began with writer Alex Haley’s popular book-length account of his family’s history, dating back to his ancestors’ abduction from Africa into the slavery institution that was the basis for much of industry and social organization in the burgeoning United States.

Yet Obama’s political ascendency — part of a softening of black American experience into the celebration of immigrant legacy — has replaced the Roots narrative, offering a more palatable figure than Kunta Kinte, as if to ameliorate the harrowing historical truth. Remaking Roots for the Obama era is “the Obama Effect” put “in effect,” as rappers used to say. It is fascinating that Los Angeles–based rapper Snoop Dogg (Calvin Broadus) issued a call to resist the new Roots. “I’m sick of this s—! How the f— are they going to put Roots on, on Memorial Day? They going to just keep beating that s— into our heads about how they did us, huh!” Despite Snoop Dogg’s vulgarity (he could as well have called it “de trop”), there’s more than street sense in his objection to indulging “the abuse that we took hundreds and hundreds of years ago.” Snoop Dogg expresses the resistance many black Americans have shown to the depiction of slavery in such high-profile mainstream films as Steven Spielberg’s Amistad and Jonathan Demme’s Beloved (which sought both political remedy and spiritual transcendence).

The black pop audience has shown little taste for the sadism that is favored by Hollywood’s “Obama Effect.” Snoop Dogg’s resistance, based on the common-sense, feel-good immediacy of hip-hop, might be called “grassroots,” whereas the “Obama Effect” represents realpolitik, a nebulous party line that uses the repetition of race-based brutality — the on-going, perverse romanticizing of slavery — to substantiate certain political agendas. These agendas, apparent in the reboot’s production and promotion, make Roots an infuriating benchmark in Obama-era race rhetoric. Since 1977, the tone of social and cultural discourse has changed. It’s also arguable that since the 2008 election, the discourse is no longer convivial or collegial. A political candidate in Altman’s Nashville ran on the ironic slogan “New Roots for the Nation,” which fits this new Roots. It reflects social and cultural division rooted in official partisan and class advantages. Snoop Dogg feels this without detailing it, but it’s become apparent in this new super-production.

On May 17, Valerie Jarrett, President Obama’s closest adviser, hosted a day-long event at the White House celebrating the new series. Nancy Dubuc, president and CEO of A+E Networks, explained her enthusiasm for the program by saying she expected it to give her corporation high ratings and industry awards. She candidly told The Hollywood Reporter: “We want it — we want not only the nominations, we want to take the whole kit and caboodle home.” The enthusiasm of both Jarrett and Dubuc recalls the Obama-era zeal that was apparent when 12 Years a Slave — perhaps the ultimate slavery-as-horror-show movie — was endorsed by the Academy Awards. How did the atrocities of slavery become a means of celebrating culture-industry piety as well as political power? Roots wasn’t remade to update awareness of contemporary racial privation but to use slavery as a bulwark for sustaining the status quo. That’s what goes unsaid when A+E officials and various race-hustlers like the Rev. Al Sharpton endorse the series, claiming it will enlighten a new generation that is ignorant of the history of slavery.

Anyone who accepts that alibi automatically accepts the failures of our education system and the culture industry. A Hollywood trade paper went with the unfounded assumption that “the brutal history of slavery [tends] to be woefully underplayed in textbooks (to say nothing of Hollywood movies and TV shows).” Even worse, a new Roots goes along with a general disregard for cultural history. It neglects such important films on the subject of slavery as Band of Angels (1957), Way Down South (1939), Slaves (1969), Skin Game (1971), Haile Gerima’s Sankofa (1992), and the extraordinary Mandingo (1975). Mandingo was a key artifact of Civil Rights Era sophistication. Director Richard Fleischer and Detroit-born writer Norman Wexler, who also wrote Joe, Serpico, and Saturday Night Fever, created indelible, near-satiric scenes of American racial history with cues to then-recent rebel impulses (as in the famous lynching speech of actor Ji-Tu Cumbuka). Knowing this cultural history makes a Roots remake unnecessary.

Ignorance of this history plays into the cultural intimidation of the wrongly educated Black Lives Matter campaign. (Ignorance also caused Kerry Washington at the NAACP awards to thank sadist Quentin Tarantino for “telling our story” in Django Unchained.) It is another patronizing Hollywood delusion to credit Black Lives Matter, not the Obama Effect, for this remake. If blacks represent 40 million out of 296.8 million viewers (according to Nielsen), then there has to be another motivation than simply popular appeal. Literary scholar Leslie Fiedler wrote the only serious consideration of the 1977 version of Roots in his 1979 pamphlet The Inadvertent Epic (which linked Uncle Tom’s Cabin, The Birth of a Nation, Gone with the Wind, and Roots). One can seriously consider President Obama as the inadvertent auteur of this new production, in which the unsettling contrast between the brutal treatment of blacks and their persistent humanity fails to reflect — or instruct — our awareness of the still desperate conditions of American life for many.